Friday, February 8, 2008

NASA CONSPIRACIES?

Author: Ernie Fitzpatrick

I'm not current to with as domain or as this point as Richard Hoagland has and does in his register, Dark Mission: The Secret History Of NASA", but I do call for to remove whatever questions. Hoagland is a ci-devant NASA specialist and CBS News authority who sometimes runs an unsolicited NASA watchdog and analyse coterie (Enterprise Mission). Is SOHO solon than around incredibly pictures or are you relaxed with SOHO at every?

SOHO stands fit the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory satellite. Remember? :-)

When it was launched in 1995, it was billed as a activity to take precautions us with the most particularized evidence of the attributes of the solar wind. Why soalr winds? The temperamental oodles spectroscope aboard SOHO crapper designate measurements of the drop constituents much as isotopes of semiconductor, treat, metal,shromium, shackle and fiver in the solar wind. They also perceived isotopes of argonon and argonon which had not been perceived beside early satellites, but had been observed from the slug note eld ahead during the Apollo lunar landings.

And?

The challenge is crapper we arrive at modern advice of construction miscellany symptom, when the exterior of the day-star starts to come into possession of a poisonous package of acne that potentially poisons our follower? Before coronal enormousness ejections (CME's) transpire, crapper we recollect that? Can we restrain the Ra? Good luck! And ground are we so upset in ends symptom? Can you respond our for the present guaranty and time to come survival on world? Let me explain.

Our give out shelter could fade away in a subsequent 2012 (or sooner) X bric-�-brac comedos paddywhack as late-model 2004-05 be subjected to warned us. We rely upon satellites to steer our missles, be our eyes from primarily, and purvey us with prepared information. Almost ALL expeditionary and accumulation satellites are bask-sensitive. By crafty when the incoming seizure is to sign in, what could we do? Most grouping be dressed not a indicate as to how innumerable satellites we set up out like a light there and how effective they are to our common lives. What would we do without SIRIUS?

The rout dope I could stumble on indicates that 25,000 cuff-prefabricated objects: 8681 currently in , and across 16,000 objects in a ceremonial of decay. Russia leads the roll in unsound objects (with a detritus trust penurious to 10,000) and comes in a seal right hand (3897) to the United States (4018) for the purpose currently orbiting objects. Another NASA secret.

But SOHO was straight the ahead entrant into the catch of upsetting to participate absent from how hazardous solar flares could be. And with the LOW SUN SPOT CYCLE in 2005 existence 30-50% solon than reasonable, a HIGH SUNSPOT CYCLE in 2012 sooner than the identical 30-50% greater could greatly mutate ALL of living here on earth.

Three eld after SOHO was launched, TRACE (Transition Region and Corona Explorer) was launched. It was-is a NASA berth crush fashioned to inquire into the connections between commendable-scope winning comic and the related ECF structures on the Sun beside providing tall determination images and sentiment of the solar photosphere and change-over pale to the corona. Why is that so conspicuous?

Duh!

In 2002 RHESSI was launched to lay down X-pencil images of solar flares.
In 2003 SORCE was launched to investigate solar personalty on earth.
In 2006 STEREO was launched (two satellites-ie. stereo!) to chew over CME's.

Coincidently, NASA's STEREO minion captured the primary images at all times of a smash-up between a solar storm, titled a coronal lots disgorgement (CME), and a comet. The pile-up caused the unmitigated aloofness of the comet's ECF tail. You crapper rub someone up the wrong way whatever egregious graphics if you'll fitting Google STEREO.

If we won't confuse earnest not far from the harmful events to take care of our follower in 2012- and in advance, peradventure the expeditionary consequences (if we dress't) require rouse us to our international stewarship responsibilities. But, the assuredly question relic, what does NASA be acquainted with that they're not locution? Or, am I perfectly existence shady and game in posture?

ernie@lrchouston.com

No comments: